Why glutathione in skincare is more about formulation than percentage claims

Skincare today often appears deceptively simple. A clean label, a hero ingredient, a bold percentage claim, and the promise of visible results. But what most people do not see is that behind every well-performing formula lies an intricate network of scientific decisions. The simplicity consumers experience on their skin is usually the outcome of careful, and often complex, formulation work carried out long before a product reaches the shelf.

(Also Read: The skin ritual which "might be working" for Samantha)

Take glutathione as an example. Over the past few years, it has become one of the most talked-about ingredients in brightening skincare. It is frequently associated with glow and even tone, and its presence on a label is often treated as proof of efficacy. Yet glutathione is not a straightforward ingredient to formulate with. It is a naturally occurring antioxidant within our cells, where it helps neutralise oxidative stress, influences melanin pathways, and supports overall cellular balance. On the skin, its role is similar; it assists in managing environmental stress, helps regulate pigment production, and supports gradual improvement in clarity and luminosity. But it does this steadily, not dramatically. 

In recent years, glutathione has increasingly been marketed at higher percentages, driven by the assumption that more must deliver better results. However, this belief is not supported by formulation science. Glutathione is a water-soluble molecule that does not readily penetrate the skin on its own, which makes formulation design critical. There is an optimal concentration range within which the skin can effectively absorb and utilise it. Beyond this range, absorption tends to plateau, while excessively high levels may raise the likelihood of irritation. For this reason, formulators must carefully balance delivery systems, stability, and skin tolerance to create products that are both effective and cosmetically elegant.

A large number on a label is not a reliable indicator of performance. Without an appropriate formulation matrix, glutathione may degrade or lose activity even before application. This is why formulation strategy matters more than percentage claims. Glutathione does not function in isolation; it requires a carefully engineered environment that protects it and supports its delivery to the skin in an active form. It can also be combined with complementary antioxidants such as Vitamin C and Vitamin E to enhance overall performance. Antioxidants generally work best as part of a system rather than as standalone actives. When designed thoughtfully, such systems reduce the need to overload a single ingredient and instead support sustained skin health over time rather than short-lived visible effects.

Equally important is skin tolerance. If a formulation disrupts the skin barrier, users are unlikely to continue long enough to see meaningful change. That is why hydration systems, soothing agents, and barrier-supporting ingredients are not secondary considerations; they are central to long-term success.

When research and development are entirely in-house, the ability to manage this complexity improves significantly. A fully integrated R&D setup allows scientists to control every stage of the process,  from raw material evaluation to stability testing and real-world simulations. It creates space for repeated testing, fine-tuning of ingredient compatibility and adjustments based on climate and usage patterns. Innovation becomes more intentional because teams are not limited to pre-made bases or outsourced systems. Instead, formulations can be built from the ground up, beginning with a specific skin concern and engineering backwards toward a solution.

In many ways, the best skincare feels uncomplicated precisely because the complexity has already been solved. A product that remains stable and supports the skin without irritation is rarely simple in its creation. It is the result of measured decisions, scientific restraint, and a deep understanding of skin physiology. When it comes to sensitive ingredients like glutathione, performance is not defined by how high the percentage appears on a label. It is defined by how thoughtfully the entire system has been constructed around it.

(Also Read: HELLO! India: Palak Tiwari's "glowy" beauty secrets to looking flawless all day)

Dr Ramesh Surianarayanan is the Head of R&D at Foxtale, one of India's leading homegrown skincare brands